Which of the following is NOT a method for identifying soldiers for ASAP?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Study for the Army Staff Sergeant or Sergeant First Class (E6) Board Test. Prep with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Get ready to advance your rank!

In the context of identifying soldiers for the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP), the correct answer is self-reporting through anonymous surveys, as this is not typically recognized as a formal method for identification. The other methods listed are actively utilized within the military framework to identify soldiers who may need assistance with substance use issues.

Voluntary identification allows soldiers to seek help on their own, encouraging a supportive environment for those needing assistance. Commander identification enables leaders to observe behavior and performance, facilitating intervention when concerns arise. Medical identification involves clinical assessments and screenings conducted by healthcare professionals to identify substance abuse issues.

In contrast, anonymous surveys, while they can collect data on soldiers' substance use and attitudes, do not serve as a direct or formal method of identifying individuals requiring support or intervention. They lack the immediacy and personal accountability of the other methods, making them less effective for urgent identification needs within ASAP. This distinction emphasizes the reliance on direct, known channels of communication within the military system, ensuring that soldiers receive appropriate care and intervention when necessary.